Comments on: Defining Social Security http://commonsenseworld.com/2005/05/defining-social-security/ Bringing Sanity Back To The World Thu, 09 Sep 2010 17:59:33 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: blaze http://commonsenseworld.com/2005/05/defining-social-security/#comment-349 blaze Wed, 05 Oct 2005 09:12:00 +0000 http://annafiltest.wordpress.com/2005/05/03/defining-social-security/#comment-349 You have a very good site on based best business home This is something I also have a large interest in and have set up a blog about <a HREF="http://www.coolmobiletone.com/bloglinkgenerator/" REL="nofollow">based best business home</a> please visit and let me know what you think. You have a very good site on based best business home This is something I also have a large interest in and have set up a blog about based best business home please visit and let me know what you think.

]]> By: Anonymous http://commonsenseworld.com/2005/05/defining-social-security/#comment-348 Anonymous Wed, 05 Oct 2005 02:22:00 +0000 http://annafiltest.wordpress.com/2005/05/03/defining-social-security/#comment-348 Hi i am totally blown away with the blogs people have created its so much fun to read alot of good info and you have also one of the best blogs !! Have some time check my link to !!<a HREF="http://www.luckpoo.com" REL="nofollow">base business home online opportunity<br/></a> Hi i am totally blown away with the blogs people have created its so much fun to read alot of good info and you have also one of the best blogs !! Have some time check my link to !!base business home online opportunity

]]> By: Marketing man http://commonsenseworld.com/2005/05/defining-social-security/#comment-347 Marketing man Sun, 02 Oct 2005 03:57:00 +0000 http://annafiltest.wordpress.com/2005/05/03/defining-social-security/#comment-347 You have a nice blog here! I will be sure to book mark you.<br/>I have a <a HREF="http://www.domaincity.ws" REL="nofollow">email in lead lead leads.com mlm opt responsive</a> site. It pretty much covers email in lead lead leads.com mlm opt responsive related stuff. Check it out if you get time :-) You have a nice blog here! I will be sure to book mark you.
I have a email in lead lead leads.com mlm opt responsive site. It pretty much covers email in lead lead leads.com mlm opt responsive related stuff. Check it out if you get time :-)

]]> By: Anonymous http://commonsenseworld.com/2005/05/defining-social-security/#comment-346 Anonymous Sat, 01 Oct 2005 22:03:00 +0000 http://annafiltest.wordpress.com/2005/05/03/defining-social-security/#comment-346 I have been to your site and I too am working very hard at adsense blog to increase my revenue. I am also looking into many NEW ways to utilize the design to further direct people to follow my ads.<br/><a HREF="http://www.bloglinkbuilder.com/profittips" REL="nofollow">adsense blog</a> I have been to your site and I too am working very hard at adsense blog to increase my revenue. I am also looking into many NEW ways to utilize the design to further direct people to follow my ads.
adsense blog

]]> By: Deek Deekster http://commonsenseworld.com/2005/05/defining-social-security/#comment-345 Deek Deekster Fri, 06 May 2005 22:44:00 +0000 http://annafiltest.wordpress.com/2005/05/03/defining-social-security/#comment-345 spillerty spillerty

]]> By: Ken Grandlund http://commonsenseworld.com/2005/05/defining-social-security/#comment-344 Ken Grandlund Fri, 06 May 2005 06:21:00 +0000 http://annafiltest.wordpress.com/2005/05/03/defining-social-security/#comment-344 (responses) <br/>Douglas- thanks for the tip. I chose to change the settings in AdSense. hopefully that will do the trick. If not, I'll take suggestion #2 and add the code. Come by again sometime.<br/><br/>Porky- I've check out both articles you've presented, and I just don't agree with the basic concept that we are all in it for ourselves. My next post will more clearly define my position regarding the necessity of a national retirement program, and that will be followed by actual proposals. Although I'm sure you'll disagree with them, I'd still encourage you to give them some thought. Thanks for dropping by.<br/><br/>David- Good to have you back. (responses)
Douglas- thanks for the tip. I chose to change the settings in AdSense. hopefully that will do the trick. If not, I’ll take suggestion #2 and add the code. Come by again sometime.

Porky- I’ve check out both articles you’ve presented, and I just don’t agree with the basic concept that we are all in it for ourselves. My next post will more clearly define my position regarding the necessity of a national retirement program, and that will be followed by actual proposals. Although I’m sure you’ll disagree with them, I’d still encourage you to give them some thought. Thanks for dropping by.

David- Good to have you back.

]]> By: David Schantz http://commonsenseworld.com/2005/05/defining-social-security/#comment-343 David Schantz Fri, 06 May 2005 02:02:00 +0000 http://annafiltest.wordpress.com/2005/05/03/defining-social-security/#comment-343 Just checking sites today. i always like yours.<br/><br/>God Bless America, God Save The Republic Just checking sites today. i always like yours.

God Bless America, God Save The Republic

]]> By: Porky Barrel http://commonsenseworld.com/2005/05/defining-social-security/#comment-342 Porky Barrel Thu, 05 May 2005 20:48:00 +0000 http://annafiltest.wordpress.com/2005/05/03/defining-social-security/#comment-342 James Glassman at TechCentralStation wrote a great article on the Social Security debate <a HREF="http://www.techcentralstation.com/030905D.html" REL="nofollow">here</a>. And, at risk of being deemed a shameless self-promoter, here are <a HREF="http://www.airbornehogsociety.com/issues/economic/socialsecurityreform.htm" REL="nofollow">my thoughts</a>. James Glassman at TechCentralStation wrote a great article on the Social Security debate here. And, at risk of being deemed a shameless self-promoter, here are my thoughts.

]]> By: Douglas http://commonsenseworld.com/2005/05/defining-social-security/#comment-341 Douglas Thu, 05 May 2005 19:22:00 +0000 http://annafiltest.wordpress.com/2005/05/03/defining-social-security/#comment-341 When I surf to your page using Blog Explosion, your AdSense words are all Surfing and Surfer related.<br/><br/>Explanation and fix here:<br/>http://rockymoore.com/archive/2005/03/27/257.aspx<br/><br/>Enjoy!<br/><br/>Douglas<br/><br/>PS No need to post this as a comment; I just couldn't find an email to you direct. When I surf to your page using Blog Explosion, your AdSense words are all Surfing and Surfer related.

Explanation and fix here:
http://rockymoore.com/archive/2005/03/27/257.aspx

Enjoy!

Douglas

PS No need to post this as a comment; I just couldn’t find an email to you direct.

]]> By: Ken Grandlund http://commonsenseworld.com/2005/05/defining-social-security/#comment-340 Ken Grandlund Thu, 05 May 2005 05:39:00 +0000 http://annafiltest.wordpress.com/2005/05/03/defining-social-security/#comment-340 (response)<br/><br/>prying1- you caught me mid reply or I'd have gotten to you in the last batch.<br/><br/>You make some good points, and I think we can all agree that the raiding of the funds has been treacherous of both parties. It only proves that they have not the public concern at heart, but rather special, targeted goals that may not always be the will of the people.<br/><br/>And while for much of the programs lifespan the money paid was done so in good faith, it is hard to argue that today's younger workers are paying into a system that they can trust to be there for them. In that sense, the money they are paying in will never be theirs, nor will there be much left for them when they retire. Today's workers do not have any such guarantee from the government, and as such need to reconfigure the program as necessary.<br/><br/>In the end, if you consider the program to be in the vein of a national retirement pension program, then all money deposited belongs to the depositor. But if it is just a social safety net type of program, to be used by those with the most need, then they taxes collected become part of the public trust, not claimable by any one person specifically, but claimable by all in need.<br/><br/>In my next post, I'll begin to explore some ways of forming a system for future workers and also look to ways to shore up the existing system to fulfill its obligations to those already entrapped in its morass.<br/><br/>Thanks for the point of view! (response)

prying1- you caught me mid reply or I’d have gotten to you in the last batch.

You make some good points, and I think we can all agree that the raiding of the funds has been treacherous of both parties. It only proves that they have not the public concern at heart, but rather special, targeted goals that may not always be the will of the people.

And while for much of the programs lifespan the money paid was done so in good faith, it is hard to argue that today’s younger workers are paying into a system that they can trust to be there for them. In that sense, the money they are paying in will never be theirs, nor will there be much left for them when they retire. Today’s workers do not have any such guarantee from the government, and as such need to reconfigure the program as necessary.

In the end, if you consider the program to be in the vein of a national retirement pension program, then all money deposited belongs to the depositor. But if it is just a social safety net type of program, to be used by those with the most need, then they taxes collected become part of the public trust, not claimable by any one person specifically, but claimable by all in need.

In my next post, I’ll begin to explore some ways of forming a system for future workers and also look to ways to shore up the existing system to fulfill its obligations to those already entrapped in its morass.

Thanks for the point of view!

]]>