Does society dictate political goals or is it the other way around? It’s getting tough to tell these days. With campaigns based on “family values” that are never really defined and legislation steeped in religious belief, one wonders which horse is pulling which cart. I use these two examples only because they are they easiest to grab, but the same conclusion can be made when examining many of our cultural activities. In a society based around the concepts of personal liberty and freedom, such as ours, it is always incumbent upon the citizens to defend their own freedom and to respect the freedom of others. This too, should be the goal of government, but instead, the politicians seek to divide the people, by inflaming cultural differences and advancing selective legislation.
It’s easy enough for them to do too. Ours is a multi-ethnic, multi-belief system, melting pot kind of place filled with people from all over the world, each bringing with them a different set of dreams and beliefs as they seek their own liberty. With no single national culture, finding divisive issues to exploit becomes as easy as taking candy from a baby. It’s an effective ploy that detracts us from keeping our eye on the ball, so to speak. While some politicians busily grandstand the newest cause du jour, the rest of our leaders are just as busily spending our hard earned tax dollars on things that further consolidate power for themselves and their benefactors, leaving the public holding an empty bag or looking at a broken program.
But freedom and liberty cannot exist without a measure of responsibility. And it is this very lack of responsibility, on an individual level and on a societal level too, that makes possible the very divisiveness our politicians exploit. In our “anything goes,” “what about me?” society, we seem to have forgotten that a lack responsible stewardship of our freedoms opens the door for government to restrict more of our freedoms in the name of preserving freedom for us all. It is this kind of upside-down reasoning that fits perfectly with our own upside-down thinking that allows us to take our freedom for granted.
Many of our political topics, the so-called “divisive issues” that seek to separate our country and paralyze meaningful, effective legislation, are things that have no place in politics anyway, but instead belong to a different part of life, a more private part of life, the part of life that makes us who we are. And despite the attempts at division, if taken in a non-political context, many of these issues require little more than Common Sense and compromise. Things like advocating tolerance towards religious beliefs or sex. Things like child rearing, teaching responsibility and work ethic. Things like race relations and entertainment. These are the some of the things that define who we are. These are not things that necessarily require legislation, but that doesn’t stop a politician from trying.
Politics should be about making sure the public is safe. Politics should be about foreign relations. Politics should be about maintaining infrastructure or social programs or the effective use of taxes. Politics should be about keeping the playing field as level as possible. But politics has no real claim to family values or public entertainment or philanthropy, other than to encourage people to find common acceptable standards while tolerating those that are not in the mainstream, but also not illegal. Once a political system begins to legislate or manipulate the daily functions and beliefs of the individual and society, freedom goes out the window, replaced by a kind of opiatic melancholy and eventual apathy.
The way to prevent this from happening is to take back the non-political issues from the politicians and resolve social conflict without the need for legislation, because with every new law put on the books, we are losing our ability to determine our own path.
In the next several essays I will begin to explore some of these dividing points that are often exploited by power hungry politicos, and look for ways to relieve the tension that exists in the citizens without having to resort to legal maneuvering. In each case, resolution will require both a changed outlook among the American people and an increased willingness to stand up for themselves. I look forward to conversations with you concerning social tolerance, the victim mentality, “family values” and parenting responsibilities, the media and entertainment industry, philanthropy, trust, and religion.
This entry was posted on Thursday, June 9th, 2005 at 6:59 am and is filed under Common Sense, Democracy, Government, Life, Social Programs.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
June 9th, 2005 at 6:23 pm
I look forward to your future posts Ken. And, I liked your sentences that start, “But politics has no real claim to family values…” so much that I converted it to a post and linked up with you over at my location.
Blog on brother, and you got my vote should you choose to run for CA governor!
June 9th, 2005 at 8:30 pm
I am the host of the Philosophical Question of the Day (PQD) Blog where we pose questions that may appeal to you. Please consider visiting the blog at http://pqd.negativespace.com and subscribing to the PQD Blog Alert so that you can be notified when new PQDs are posted. Just e-mail me at pqd@negativespace.com with the e-mail address you would like the Alert sent to. Also, please encourage your friends and colleagues to join as we are seeking to boost membership to the PQD Blog, a free blog for free expression.
June 10th, 2005 at 1:06 pm
The modern Republican Party has decided that the corp, the Church, and the Government will all be one and the same.
When you have a Government doling out money to (certain) Churches, you have a Government that has inserted itself into the “values” debate-it does, in fact, seek to be the arbiter. The “wall” between Church and State has been breached and must be repaired unless we are to have imposed on us a monolithic version of “Family Values.”
June 10th, 2005 at 11:02 pm
glad to see you have common sense. most just act or react.
June 11th, 2005 at 2:37 pm
I wonder if there are not some fundamental confusions that should be sorted…ethics vs. morality and rights vs. responsibilities. When governments and organisations do the sorting as opposed to individuals, these concepts (and people) ususally are the losers.
As always a thought provoking post.
Best regards (and give my best to George, Washington!
June 12th, 2005 at 5:27 am
(responses)
Windspike- Thanks for the support, but for the writing and the endorsement.
Jolly Roger- Church-Corp-Government- all decided by the state. Seems eerily reminescent of other places in other times…..
Yes, the breach must be fixed.
Euro Yank- Most just sit and complain. The least minimal form of action would be casting a vote, even an uninformed vote. Yet with just around half the voting age population bothering to do that small thing, there isn’t even action or reaction, just inaction, which is tantamount to capitulation. Thanks for the comment.
HomoInsapiens- Ethics and morality indeed are the driving forces behind laws and actions, but only those acts that can be agreed upon by an overwhelming majority should become legislation.
Rights carry responsibilities and can’t effectively be in opposition or even competition or they dilute and/or repudiate the entire concept of shared freedom.
Next time I’m in the neighborhood, I’ll give George your regards.
June 12th, 2005 at 8:08 am
What politics (federal government) is supposed to do is explained in the Constitution. Our elected officials should protect, defend and abide by it. Sometimes I wonder if they have even read it. I have posted my Question Of The Week, I hope you will stop by to answer it.
God Bless America, God Save The Republic.